Showing posts with label Ethics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Ethics. Show all posts

Saturday, August 8, 2009

Chavez Tightens His Grip On Venezuela

I read an article about some laws that Chavez is trying to get passed in Venezuela. These laws will potentially hinder the Venezuelan media from accurate reporting.

On July 30, 2009, Venezuela's attorney general introduced draft legislation on 'media crimes' that establish prison sentences of up to four years for anyone who, through media outlets, provides 'false' information that 'harm[s] the interests of the state.'
...
Minister Cabello also proposed new regulations that state that any cable channel with more than 30 percent Venezuelan-produced programming (including shows and advertisements) would be compelled to transmit President Chávez's speeches live at his request, and would be subject to Venezuelan media laws, including the Law on Social Responsibility.
Source: Human Rights Watch

It is interesting to note what we take for granted in articles like this (the assumptions of the writer of the story): the ability of people to be able to able to filter the truth of media, the goodness of the media, our rights to know, that a free market economy is better than a controlled economy.

Also, this got me thinking about Jesus. It strikes me time and time again that, though Jesus had the power and the popular vote, he never sought office. In fact, the New Testament Gospel writers saw this (as Jesus must have himself) as a major evil, satanic temptation.

I am going to enjoy reading The Politics of Jesus again over the next few months. I was unable to grasp it the first time I read it, about a year ago, but my level of understanding has grow since then.

How people should be involved in politics/government is a hugely important topic.

Monday, August 3, 2009

Pleasure: Small, Medium, or Large?

Recently, I listened to a segment on the health problems related to overeating in America and how the food industry has helped create that (see the end of the entry for a brief description and a link to the piece) In my opinion, the story is worth watching/reading/ listening to. Before I address the news story, I would first like to talk about something that Plato has taught me and that I think about on a regular basis.

In 583b- 587a of The Republic, using a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon, Plato tells us that there are three levels to pleasure: Pain, pleasure, and repose (a sort of neutral point between pain and pleasure, something like good, but not great). Plato, through Socrates then says, "Let's not be persuaded that relief from pain is pure pleasure or that relief from pleasure is pure pain." Those who have not reached for pleasure and have supposed that repose is the greatest pleasure are missing out on true pleasure. Of course, here, Plato is talking about the pleasure of virtue (specifically, virtue of the mind, or wisdom; and, in fact, the proper allotment of pleasure to each part of a person).

In our context, Plato reminds us that, though we get pleasure out of eating fatty, and sugar-saturated foods, it is lower on the scale of pleasure from simply taking care of our bodies, through temperance and self-control (which, I admit, I need to ask God for more of). Indulging in/ being controlled by many pleasures will actually stop us from better, higher pleasures. They will hinder our judgment, create bad habits, and alter our characters and our ability to be wise. Often this is subtle. Often it is difficult to perceive why wisdom is so important and why we shouldn't follow the whims of lower pleasure.

We should trust the sensitive palates (speaking metaphorically here) of the likes of Plato, Aristotle, Jesus, Thomas Aquinas, and others who longed for, sought, and experiences happiness like few have. We must not settle for "repose", that comfortable spot between pain and pleasure, in our lives. Let us search for a higher pleasure.

Here is another way to understand what Plato was trying to get at: Plato tells us that when the proper ruler is in place, that everything is aligned correctly and that everything receives what is due. When tyrants rule, they seek not for the proper alignment of society, but to gain the most pleasure for themselves, and in so doing ruin the nation.

It is the same in us. If the proper ruler is in place (the mind, if it is wise) alots proper amounts of pleasure to the other parts of a person (not too much or too little food, sex, fear, pride, etc.). But if, say, the desire for food takes over, it will be a tyrant, and won't allow the mind or other important parts of a person to receive their proper pleasure. Soon enough the whole person may be ruined.

Perhaps this bit has been too metaphorical and to "airy", with nothing "solid" being said. I apologize for that, but I have still thought it worth sharing. We will do well to consider Plato's pain-repose-pleasure continuum.

Going back to the news story: as I listened, it struck me that there are two sides to this story:
1) Yes, food companies are probably making their food more tasty so that we will buy more. This "tastiness" is often unhealthy. This unhealthy "tastiness" has, to a certain extent, become an addiction, even at a chemical level. Food companies need to become virtuous, selling good products. This first part was the major focus of the story.
2) Though food companies can and should be blamed for part of the problem, and, if smoking is regulated, so should addictive and bad foods, but how much is this the fault of regular people who have not had enough virtue to steer clear from fatty foods? It is always our job to become more and more virtuous, and this often includes breaking bad habits. We need to become more virtuous.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* Former FDA Commissioner David Kessler: "The End of Overeating: Taking Control of the Insatiable American Appetite" *

A new report from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention warns that the direct medical costs of obesity total about $147 billion a year. That amounts to nine percent of all US medical costs. It's also over $50 billion more than the annual spending on cancer. In the midst of this national focus on obesity, today we'll speak to David Kessler, who has spent the last seven years trying to understand how the food industry has changed American eating habits, made certain foods difficult to resist, and helped create the country's number one public health issue.

Listen/Watch/Read
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/8/3/former_fda_commissioner_david_kessler_the

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

Letter to Peter Kent, Regarding Honduras

About the Honduras Situation

Dear Mr. Kent,

Recently. I have been learning about the situation in Honduras. It is not clear to me if President Zalaya was trying to extend his presidency or not. I suspect that people in power often want to extend their reign.
It is also unclear to me whether Mr. Micheletti has a good goal, though is pursuing it through evil means. I suspect that Micheletti should not be supported as no leader should call another names such as Mr. Micheletti called President Obama. Also, I see that Dr. Juan Almendares, who appears to be an upstanding person, and also ran against Pr. Zalaya in the last presidential elections supports Zalaya being accepted back into the country.

I also know that there are some Canadian companies in Honduras (mining and textiles) that might profit if Pr. Zalaya is kept out of the government. I urge to to put pressure on these companies not to support the coup and to stay out of political affairs for the time being. What is profit compared to living quality?

In light of all of this, I am unsure how to advise you. I do request that you research more into the situation, not trusting the words of Pr. Zalaya or Mr. Micheletti completely. It is my guess that it is within your power to find out where Canadian aid is going (to whom and for what) and I ask you to do this. If you are refused, then you must cease aid, understanding that the usage of the aid is being hidden for most likely evil means. I suggest this as your first step, as it will reveal the intentions of Micheletti and his care for the Honduran people.

Thank you for your time and consideration. I will be posting this on my bLinklog (http://important-topics-ahub.blogspot.com/) for my readers to see. Please respond to this email. Please reply with your wisdom on this issue and your intended action in regards to Honduras.

Respectfully,
xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(End of letter)

Peter Kent is Minister of State for Foreign Affairs (Americas) in the Canadian Cabinet.

If you would like to research some of what is happening, visit the sites below:
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB124744094880829815.html
http://www.democracynow.org/2009/7/15/honduras
http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2009/07/02/honduras-decree-suspends-basic-rights
http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-estrada10-2009jul10,0,1570598.story
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=14369
http://www.straight.com/article-238367/harsha-walia-dissecting-coup-honduras
http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=1747599
http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/Canada+condemns+Honduran+coup/1743900/story.html
http://www.peterkent.ca/

After informing yourself, and if you can make an informed and prudent judgment, or have any good suggestions on this issue, contact Peter Kent.
Contact Peter

7600 Yonge Street
Thornhill, Ontario
L4J 1V9
Phone: 905-886-9911
Fax: 905-886-5267
Email: kentp@parl.gc.ca

Community Office
7600 Yonge Street
Thornhill, Ontario
L4J 1V9
Phone: (905) 886-1426
Fax: (905) 886-5267

Ottawa Office
Peter Kent
110 Justice Building
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario
K1A 0A6
Phone: (613) 992-0253
Fax: (613) 992-0887

Tuesday, July 14, 2009

2001 Massacre of Suspected Taliban POWs

Obama Calls for Probe into 2001 Massacre of at Least 2,000 Suspected Taliban POWs by US-Backed Afghan Warlord

http://www.democracynow.org/2009/7/13/obama_calls_for_probe_into_2001

It was incredible to hear how these suspected Taliban POWs were treated. The evidence of the massacre is clear. What is not clear is how much the U.S. military/government was involved. It is wrong for people to be treated in that manner; worse than animals should be treated. Inhuman. I am glad that Obama is open to inquiry about this.

Monday, July 13, 2009

Love the Sinner, Hate the Sin


Recently I received an email that concluded with this: Love the sinner, hate the sin.

It is easy to understand this in the wrong way, from both directions. I mean, (1) if you are the speaker of the sentence it is easy to forget that you are a sinner and that the other person, who is in fact a sinner, is essentially good, else God would not love him. And (2) if you are the receiver of such a sentiment it can easily offend us to think of ourselves as sinners, and we wonder if that other person knows at all how to differentiate between what I do and who I am.

I would like to show two quotes that help us understand this phrase. The first quote comes from C.S. Lewis (Mere Christianity, the chapter entitled Forgiveness), and the other comes from St. Thomas Aquinas (Commentary on the Ten Commandments, in the preamble explaining how love for God and neighbour fulfills all the commandments). It is important to note that these authors make none of the aforementioned mistakes. The authors (1) explicitly or implicitely admit their own sinfulness. (2)They wish that others would lead the happiest of lives, not wishing them condemnation or hell, realizing that God is good in every way. (3) The authors show that this phrase must lead us to be merciful, compassionate and forgiving. (4) Lastly, there is justice going on, in that the evil is rightly hated while those whom God has created and loved are being loved.

The most important notice I can give is this: those people who use this phrase wrongly, to condemn people, to judge those they should not judge, to feel justified in feeling high and "righteous", to be unmerciful or unforgiving...those people don't understand God correctly, as these authors do. C.S. Lewis and St. Thomas Aquinas understand God to be the epitome of Goodness, Justice, Wisdom, and Power. Christians believe that God is so good and merciful and life-affirming that he paid a great - the greatest - price to help us. He is Just in that all of sin has been punished, through Christ, and that he has done it through a human to free humans and that he has not removed our free will to reject his goodness. He is wise because he devised a way to do all this. And all of this would be meaningless if God could not actually do this, but God is in fact all-powerful. Anyways, enough with my introduction.

(1)
For a long time I used to think this a silly, straw-splitting distinction: how could you hate what a man did and not hate the man? But years later it occurred to me that there was one man to whom I had been doing this all my life - namely myself. However much I might dislike my own cowardice or conceit of greed, I went on loving myself. There had never been the slightest difficulty about it. In fact the very reason why I hated the things was that I loved the man. Just because I loved myself, I was sorry to find that I was the sort of man who did those things. Consequently, Christianity does not want us to reduce by one atom the hatred we feel for cruelty and treachery. We ought to hate them. Not one word of what we have said about them needs to be unsaid. But it does want us to hate them in the same way in which we hate things in ourselves: being sorry that the man should have done such things, and hoping, if it is anyway possible, that somehow, sometime, somewhere he can be cured and made [more] human again. - C. S. Lewis

(2)
“Love your neighbor as yourself.” This precept the Jews and Pharisees badly understood, believing that God commanded them to love their friends and hate their enemies. Therefore, by “neighbors” they understood only friends. Christ meant to repudiate this understanding when he said (Mt 5:44): “Love your enemies; do good to those who hate you.” Note that whoever hates his brother is not in the state of salvation (1 Jn 2:9): “He who hates his brother is in the darkness.”
We must be aware, however, of texts to the contrary. For the saints hated some people (Ps 138:22): “I hated them with perfect hatred.” And in the Gospel (Lk 14:26): “If anyone does not hate his father and mother and wife and sons and brothers and sisters, even his own soul, he cannot be my disciple.” We should realize that in all that we do, what Christ did should be our example. For God loves and hates. In any man two things should be considered: his nature and the wrong. What is of nature in man should be loved, what is wrong should be hated. So if anyone wished a person to be in hell, he would be hating his nature, but if he wished him to be good, he would be hating the sin, which should always be hated (Ps 5:7): “You hate all who do evil.” And (Wis 11:25), “Lord, you love all that exists, and hate nothing which you have made.” See, then, what God loves and hates: He loves what is of nature and hates what is wrong.
We should realize, however, that sometimes a person can do evil without sinning, that is, when he does evil so that he may desire good, because God also does this. For instance, when a man is sick and is converted to good, whereas while he was well he was evil. In the same way someone can be converted to good when he meets adversity, after being evil while living in prosperity, according to the text (Is 28:19): “Terror alone shall convey the message.” Another case is to desire the evil of a tyrant destroying the Church, in as much as you desire the good of the Church through the destruction of the tyrant; thus (2 Mac 1:17): “Blessed in every way be God who has punished the wicked.” And all must want this not just by willing it, but also by doing it. For it is not a sin justly to hang the evil; for they are ministers of God who do this, according the Apostle (Rm 13), and these people are acting in love, because punishment is given at times to castigate evil, and at times for the sake of a greater and divine good. For the good of a city is a greater good than the life of one man. But note that it is not enough not to wish evil, but one must also wish good, that is the correction of the sinner and eternal life.
For someone can wish the good of another in two ways. One way is general, in so far as the person is a creature of God and is capable of partaking in eternal life. The other way is special, in so far as the person is a friend or companion. No one is excluded from a general love, for everyone should pray for everyone, and help anyone in extreme need. But you are not held to be familiar with everyone, unless he asks pardon, because then he would be your friend; and if you refused him you would be hating a friend. Thus it is said (Mt 6:14-15): “If you forgive people their sins, your Heavenly Father will also forgive you yours; but if you do not forgive them, neither will your Father forgive you your sins.” And in the Lord’s Prayer it is said (Mt 6:9): “Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us.”